Gaming PCs Built for
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024

MSFS 2024 constantly streams photogrammetry scenery tiles while simultaneously processing aircraft systems, weather, ATC, and AI. This data-intensive workload causes frequent CPU cache misses when the processor cannot find the data it needs in its local cache and has to fetch it from RAM. AMD Ryzen X3D processors carry up to 96MB of L3 cache — three to four times more than equivalent non-X3D processors — which significantly reduces how often the CPU stalls waiting for data. The result is more consistent frame delivery, lower frame time variance, and smoother scenery loading, particularly in dense photogrammetric cities.

Yes, more than in most games. MSFS 2024 streams photogrammetry data from local storage and the internet simultaneously. When storage read speeds are slow, the sim outpaces the drive's ability to deliver scenery data and the result is blurry ground textures, pop-in, and loading hitches as you approach airports. A Gen4 NVMe drive with read speeds above 5,000 MB/s is the minimum recommended. A Gen5 drive at 10,000+ MB/s removes storage as a bottleneck entirely. SATA SSDs and hard drives are not suitable for MSFS 2024.

32GB DDR5 covers most configurations, including payware aircraft and popular Orbx scenery. Where 32GB becomes limiting is in the most add-on-heavy setups: multiple large Orbx scenery regions loaded simultaneously, complex payware airports with high-detail ground textures, and high-fidelity aircraft with full avionics systems. If that describes your library, 64GB is the right choice. If you are not sure whether your specific add-on combination will push beyond 32GB, call Kevin — he can advise based on what you fly and where.

Dense photogrammetric cities like London, New York, and Tokyo are the most CPU and storage-intensive areas in MSFS 2024. The sim is streaming thousands of high-resolution building and terrain tiles in real time, and the density of the environment means more tiles, more draw calls, and more data passing through the CPU simultaneously. Rural and coastal flying places a fraction of this load on the system. A build that runs smoothly over Scotland will show its limits over central London with payware scenery. If London or other dense cities are part of your regular flying, size your build for that scenario — not the easier one.

VR renders two full frames simultaneously — one per eye — which approximately doubles the GPU workload on top of an already CPU-intensive simulation. This makes MSFS 2024 in VR one of the most demanding consumer PC workloads. A high-end build (RTX 5070 Ti, Ryzen 9 X3D, 32GB DDR5) is the minimum for a usable VR experience with reduced settings. For smooth VR with high fidelity and add-ons, an enthusiast build with an RTX 5080 or 5090 is the right target. The specific VR headset also matters — higher-resolution headsets require more GPU power. Call Kevin with your headset model and he will confirm the right spec.

MSFS 2024 supports DLSS for NVIDIA RTX GPUs and FSR for AMD Radeon GPUs. DLSS renders at a lower internal resolution and uses AI upscaling to reconstruct the output at a higher display resolution, which reduces GPU workload substantially. In practice this means a mid-range RTX 5070 can deliver 1440p image quality at GPU load closer to 1080p rendering. DLSS is recommended at high-end and enthusiast tiers for 4K. At the mid-range tier, enabling DLSS Quality mode at 1440p delivers a good image with meaningful performance headroom. Note: DLSS helps the GPU — it does not reduce the CPU or storage bottleneck.

The G6 Sonic FSX range is Ginger6's dedicated flight simulation line, built around AMD Ryzen X3D processors and NVIDIA RTX GPUs chosen specifically for MSFS 2024 performance. The FSX3 covers the mid-range pilot flying with standard add-ons. The FSX5 is for study-level aircraft with payware scenery. The FSX6 is the flagship for 4K ultra and VR with no add-on ceiling. If you are unsure which model covers your specific aircraft and scenery library, call Kevin on 01902 714533. He flies flight simulators himself and can advise based on what you actually fly — not a generic spec sheet.

Yes, with similar performance characteristics. DCS World and X-Plane 12 are both CPU and RAM intensive — a build optimised for MSFS 2024 transfers well. The key distinction is DCS World in VR, which is more demanding than MSFS 2024 in VR and may require an enthusiast build if VR in DCS is your primary target. X-Plane 12 is better threaded than MSFS 2024 and generally runs well on the same hardware. If you fly across multiple simulators, call Kevin with the full list — he will confirm whether a single build covers all of them at your target settings.